Springer v. Astrue
Filing
29
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of Chief United States Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan filed December 27, 2013 24 . 2. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 15 is GRANTED, and this case is REMANDED for reversal and award of benefits. 3. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 21 is DENIED. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 2/24/14. (GRR) cc: SSA. Modified on 2/24/2014 (lmb).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
VANNESSA E. SPRINGER,
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
Civil File No. 12-3115 (MJD/JSM)
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
Lionel H. Peabody, Peabody Law Office, Counsel for Plaintiff.
Ann M. Bildtsen, Assistant United States Attorney, Counsel for Defendant.
The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and
Recommendation of Chief United States Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan filed
December 27, 2013. Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of
Social Security, filed objections to the Report and Recommendation.
Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review upon the
record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the
Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of Chief United States Magistrate
Judge Boylan filed December 27, 2013.
1
Accordingly, based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED:
1. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of Chief United
States Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan filed December 27, 2013
[Docket No. 24].
2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 15] is
GRANTED, and this case is REMANDED for reversal and
award of benefits.
3. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 21] is
DENIED.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: February 24, 2014
s/ Michael J. Davis
Michael J. Davis
Chief Judge
United States District Court
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?