Hesla v. Cedars 94 et al

Filing 8

ORDER Adopting 4 Report and Recommendation; Overruling 7 Objections; Denying 2 Application on Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 02/25/13. (kll)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA PAUL HESLA, Civil No. 13-285 (RHK/JJG) Plaintiff, ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION v. CEDARS 94/THE GOODMAN GROUP, THE PRE-PETITION SCREENING PROGRAM, and ROSEMARY A. MUNNS, Defendants. The above-entitled matter came before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. Based upon the undersigned’s de novo review of the Objections, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Objections (Doc. No. 7) are OVERRULED; 2. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 4) is ADOPTED; 3. Plaintiff=s application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 2) is DENIED; and 4. This action is summarily DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: February 25, 2013 s/Richard H. Kyle RICHARD H. KYLE United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?