Hesla v. Cedars 94 et al

Filing 8

ORDER Adopting 4 Report and Recommendation; Overruling 7 Objections; Denying 2 Application on Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 02/25/13. (kll)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

PAUL HESLA,
Civil No. 13-285 (RHK/JJG)
Plaintiff,
ORDER ON REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION

v.
CEDARS 94/THE GOODMAN GROUP,
THE PRE-PETITION SCREENING
PROGRAM, and ROSEMARY A. MUNNS,
Defendants.

The above-entitled matter came before the Court upon the Report and
Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Objections have been filed to
that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted.
Based upon the undersigned’s de novo review of the Objections, the Report and
Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all the files, records and proceedings
herein, IT IS ORDERED:
1.

The Objections (Doc. No. 7) are OVERRULED;

2.

The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 4) is ADOPTED;

3.

Plaintiff=s application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 2)
is DENIED; and

4.

This action is summarily DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: February 25, 2013
s/Richard H. Kyle
RICHARD H. KYLE
United States District Judge