Mackey et al v. Jutila

Filing 56

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant is held in civil contempt for failing to obey the Court's Orders dated December 3, 2013 and February 10, 2014 and a bench warrant for the Defendant's arrest will issue ten days from the date of this Order unless the Defendant purges the contempt on or before ten days from the date of this Order. (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 5/23/14. (GRR)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Tim Mackey et al., Plaintiffs, v. ORDER Civil No. 13‐432(MJD/LIB) Andrew Jutila d/b/a AJ’s Companies d/b/a Andrew Jutila Companies, Defendant. _________________________________________________________________ Carl S. Wosmek, Amy L. Court and Christy E. Lawrie, McGrann Shea Carnival Straughn & Lamb, Chartered, Counsel for Plaintiffs. John H. Bray, Maki & Overom, LTD, Counsel for Defendant. _________________________________________________________________ By Order dated March 13, 2014, Defendant was ordered to show cause why he should not be held in contempt for failing to obey the Court’s Orders dated December 3, 2013 and February 10, 2014, and to show cause why he should not be committed to confinement until compliance with the Court’s Orders.  The Defendant was ordered to appear before this Court on May 22, 2014, in Courtroom 1 at the United States District Courthouse in Duluth, Minnesota.  Defendant did not appear at the May 22, 2014 hearing. 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant is held in civil contempt for failing to obey the Court’s Orders dated December 3, 2013 and February 10, 2014 and a bench warrant for the Defendant’s arrest will issue ten days from the date of this Order unless the Defendant purges the contempt on or before ten days from the date of this Order. Date: May 23, 2014 s/ Michael J. Davis                             Michael J. Davis Chief Judge United States District Court 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?