Mackey et al v. Jutila
Filing
56
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant is held in civil contempt for failing to obey the Court's Orders dated December 3, 2013 and February 10, 2014 and a bench warrant for the Defendant's arrest will issue ten days from the date of this Order unless the Defendant purges the contempt on or before ten days from the date of this Order. (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 5/23/14. (GRR)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Tim Mackey et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ORDER
Civil No. 13‐432(MJD/LIB)
Andrew Jutila d/b/a AJ’s Companies
d/b/a Andrew Jutila Companies,
Defendant.
_________________________________________________________________
Carl S. Wosmek, Amy L. Court and Christy E. Lawrie, McGrann Shea
Carnival Straughn & Lamb, Chartered, Counsel for Plaintiffs.
John H. Bray, Maki & Overom, LTD, Counsel for Defendant.
_________________________________________________________________
By Order dated March 13, 2014, Defendant was ordered to show cause why
he should not be held in contempt for failing to obey the Court’s Orders dated
December 3, 2013 and February 10, 2014, and to show cause why he should not
be committed to confinement until compliance with the Court’s Orders. The
Defendant was ordered to appear before this Court on May 22, 2014, in
Courtroom 1 at the United States District Courthouse in Duluth, Minnesota.
Defendant did not appear at the May 22, 2014 hearing.
1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant is held in civil contempt for
failing to obey the Court’s Orders dated December 3, 2013 and February 10, 2014
and a bench warrant for the Defendant’s arrest will issue ten days from the date
of this Order unless the Defendant purges the contempt on or before ten days
from the date of this Order.
Date: May 23, 2014
s/ Michael J. Davis
Michael J. Davis
Chief Judge
United States District Court
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?