Kilgore v. King et al

Filing 51

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 18 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Malachi Kilgore, 35 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Cari Gerlicher, John King(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on August 26, 2014. (HAZ)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA _____________________________________________________________________ MALACHI KILGORE, Civil No. 13-634 (JRT/FLN) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION JOHN KING et al, Defendants. ________________________________________________________________________ Malachi Kilgore, #205781, MCF-Stillwater, 970 Pickett Street North, Bayport, MN 55003, pro se plaintiff, Jackson Evans, OFFICE OF THE MINNESOTA ATTORNEY GENERAL, 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 900, St Paul, MN 55101-2127, for defendants. Based upon the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel dated August 8, 2014, all the files and records, and no objections having been filed to the Report and Recommendation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment [Docket No. 18] is DENIED; 2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment [Docket No. 35] is GRANTED; 3. Plaintiff’s claim against Defendants in their individual capacities for violation of the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause is DISMISSED with prejudice insofar as Kilgore argues that the STG designation prevents him from obtaining central texts, being sent periodicals, and engaging in Parliament activities; and 4. Plaintiff’s claim against Defendants in their individual capacities for violation of RLUIPA is DISMISSED with prejudice. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. DATED: August 26, 2014 at Minneapolis, Minnesota. ____s/John R. Tunheim ____ JOHN R. TUNHEIM United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?