Witthuhn v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC et al

Filing 72

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation 69 - Nationstar Mortgage's motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, to dismiss for failure to prosecute 52 is GRANTED to the extent Nationstar Mortgage seeks dismissal for failure to prosecute. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on August 26, 2014. (CBC)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Douglas Witthuhn, Plaintiff, v. Civil No. 13-680 (JNE/JJK) ORDER Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, Aurora Bank, FSB, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., MERSCORP, Inc., and all other persons unknown claiming any right, title, estate, interest, or lien in the real estate described in the complaint herein, Defendants. In a Report and Recommendation dated August 8, 2014, the Honorable Jeffrey J. Keyes, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that Nationstar Mortgage, LLC’s motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, to dismiss for failure to prosecute be granted to the extent Nationstar Mortgage seeks dismissal for failure to prosecute; and that Plaintiff’s remaining claim be dismissed with prejudice. 1 Plaintiff did not object. Having conducted a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation [Docket No. 69]. See D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). Based on the files, records, and proceedings herein, and for the reasons stated above, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Nationstar Mortgage’s motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, to dismiss for failure to prosecute [Docket No. 52] is GRANTED to the extent Nationstar Mortgage seeks dismissal for failure to prosecute. 1 In June 2013, the Court granted in part and denied in part Defendants’ motion to dismiss. 1 2. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: August 26, 2014 s/Joan N. Ericksen JOAN N. ERICKSEN United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?