Lejon v. MacInnes et al
Filing
23
TRAVEL ORDER AND MEMORANDUM DIRECTING CHILD RETURNED TO SWEDEN. 1. The Court shall release O.R.L.M.'s Swedish and American passport to representatives of Walling, Berg & Debele on Tuesday, April 23, 2013. 2. Respondents shall deliver O.R.L.M. to the law office of Walling, Berg & Debele, 121 South Eighth Street, Suite 1100, Minneapolis, MN, on Wednesday, April 24, 2013 at 11:30 a.m. The Court expects all parties to act in the best interests of the Child in carrying out this paragraph and all portions of this Order. Specifically, there should be private time for lunch and for an exchange between Respondent MacInnes and her mother. The parties shall allow sufficient time for the exchange and shall make every effort to facilitate a smooth transition so as to limit any potential emotional distress for the Child. All parties shall act in the best interests of the Child, irrespective of how the parties each view the difficult circumstances with which they are faced. 3. Respondent MacInnes shall execute all necessary authorizations allowing O.R.L.M to travel with Annette Bengmark MacInnes. Annette Bengmark MacInnes and O.R.L.M. are scheduled to depart on April 24, 2013, from Minneapolis/St. Paul on Air France flight AF9301 at 5:05 p.m., arriving in Paris at approximately 8:35 a.m. on April 25, 2013, to meet connecting Air France flight AF1352 departing at 9:45 a.m. and arriving at 11:45 a.m. in Goteborg, Landvetter. 4. All prior consistent orders remain in full force and effect. 5. The attached memorandum is made a part hereof.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 4/22/2013. (BJS)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Mikael Lejon,
Civil No. 13-695 (DWF/SER)
Petitioner,
TRAVEL ORDER AND
MEMORANDUM DIRECTING
CHILD RETURNED TO SWEDEN
v.
Mariah MacInnes and Chad Talbot,
Respondents.
Nancy Zalusky Berg, Esq., and Liselotte Kaiser, Esq., Walling, Berg & Debele, P.A.,
counsel for Petitioner.
Gerald O. Williams, Jr., Esq., Williams Divorce & Family law, P.A., counsel for
Respondents.
On March 26, 2013, Petitioner Mikael Lejon filed a petition against Respondents
Mariah MacInnes and Chad Talbot pursuant to the Hague Convention on the Civil
Aspects of International Child Abduction, 19 I.L.M. 1501 (1980), and the International
Child Abduction Remedies Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 11601, et seq., alleging Respondent
MacInnes wrongfully removed the Child, O.R.L.M., from Sweden and the Child has been
wrongfully retained by Respondents in the State of Minnesota. This Court held an
ex parte hearing on April 8, 2013 and found the Child to be a citizen and habitual resident
of Sweden within the meaning of Article 3 of the Convention and that the Child was
wrongfully removed from Sweden. An Order Directing Return of Child was issued by
this Court on April 9, 2013. The undersigned Judge ordered O.R.L.M. be returned no
later than April 25, 2013. Respondent MacInnes has elected not to return to Sweden with
O.R.L.M., and has agreed to a third-party escort.
ORDER
Based on the foregoing, and all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED:
1.
The Court shall release O.R.L.M.’s Swedish and American passport to
representatives of Walling, Berg & Debele on Tuesday, April 23, 2013.
2.
Respondents shall deliver O.R.L.M. to the law office of Walling, Berg &
Debele, 121 South Eighth Street, Suite 1100, Minneapolis, MN, on Wednesday, April 24,
2013 at 11:30 a.m. The Court expects all parties to act in the best interests of the Child in
carrying out this paragraph and all portions of this Order. Specifically, there should be
private time for lunch and for an exchange between Respondent MacInnes and her
mother. The parties shall allow sufficient time for the exchange and shall make every
effort to facilitate a smooth transition so as to limit any potential emotional distress for
the Child. All parties shall act in the best interests of the Child, irrespective of how the
parties each view the difficult circumstances with which they are faced.
3.
Respondent MacInnes shall execute all necessary authorizations allowing
O.R.L.M to travel with Annette Bengmark MacInnes. Annette Bengmark MacInnes and
O.R.L.M. are scheduled to depart on April 24, 2013, from Minneapolis/St. Paul on Air
France flight AF9301 at 5:05 p.m., arriving in Paris at approximately 8:35 a.m. on
2
April 25, 2013, to meet connecting Air France flight AF1352 departing at 9:45 a.m. and
arriving at 11:45 a.m. in Goteborg, Landvetter.
4.
All prior consistent orders remain in full force and effect.
5.
The attached memorandum is made a part hereof.
Dated: April 22, 2013
s/Donovan W. Frank
DONOVAN W. FRANK
United States District Judge
MEMORANDUM
Petitioner, Respondent MacInnes, and friends and relatives of both parties and the
Child must act in the best interests of the Child in these very difficult circumstances,
irrespective of how they view one another. This means that the Court expects, as I am
sure the courts of Sweden will expect, that a mode of communication be established
between the Child and Respondent MacInnes once the parties’ five-year-old daughter is
in Sweden. The best interests of this five-year-old girl demand that the parties do so no
matter how they view one another. That also means that the parties and respective
counsel should work together to expedite the matter in Sweden, absent a stipulation of the
parties. Hopefully, regardless of the outcome, the best interests of the parties’
five-year-old daughter will be served.
The Court fully expects the parties to contact the Court, if need be, provided that
all parties have notice, if the Court can be of assistance in any way in expediting this
matter. The parties, as well as the appropriate officials within the State Department for
3
the United States, as well as the appropriate officials in Sweden, have an obligation to
carry out their responsibilities, but must all do their very best to act in the best interests of
this five-year-old girl.
D.W.F.
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?