Prado v. Minnesota, State of

Filing 8

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation 5 denying 4 Application on Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus 1 is DENIED; 2. Petitione r's application to proceed in forma pauperis 4 is DENIED; 3. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and 4. Petitioner is NOT granted a Certificate of Appealability. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on June 18, 2013. (clg)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

FELIX PRADO,

Civil No. 13-1261 PJS/AJB

Petitioner,

v.

ORDER

STATE OF MINNESOTA,
Respondent.

Based upon the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendation by
United States Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan dated May 29, 2013, all the files and
records, and no objections having been filed to said Recommendation,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus, (Docket No. 1), is DENIED;
2. Petitioner’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, (Docket No. 4), is DENIED;
3. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and
4. Petitioner is NOT granted a Certificate of Appealability.

DATED: 06/18, 2013.

s/Patrick J. Schiltz
Judge Patrick J. Schiltz
U. S. District Court