Guddeck et al v SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Filing
110
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois dated May 13, 2014 76 . 2. Plaintiff's Motion to Remand to State Court 53 is DENIED.(Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 7/22/14. (GRR)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
KAYLEA GUDDECK,
a Minor, by Julie Guddeck,
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
Civil File No. 13-2508 (MJD/LIB)
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION,
Defendant.
Aaron Heckaman, Adam D. Peavy, Justin C. Jenson, Kenneth W. Pearson, Mario
D’Angelo, Michael K. Johnson, Robert W. Cowan, Rolf Fiebiger, Sundeep
Grewal, and Thomas Scott Allen, Bailey Peavy Bailey, PLLC, Counsel for
Plaintiff.
Andrew T. Bayman, Halli D. Cohn, Jaime E. Davis, Lauren Reeder McClurg, and
Robert K. Woo, Jr., King & Spalding LLP, Jerry W. Blackwell and Peter J. Goss,
Blackwell Burke PA, Counsel for Defendant.
The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois, dated May
13, 2014. [Docket No. 76] Plaintiff filed objections to the Report and
Recommendation. [Docket No. 79]
1
Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review upon the
record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the
Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge
Brisbois dated May 13, 2014.
Accordingly, based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED:
1. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois dated May 13, 2014 [Docket No. 76].
2. Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand to State Court [Docket No. 53] is
DENIED.
Dated: July 22, 2014
s/ Michael J. Davis
Michael J. Davis
Chief Judge
United States District Court
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?