Dudley v. Miles et al

Filing 16

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Adopting 15 Report and Recommendation; Denying 12 Motion to Appoint Counsel; Denying 14 Motion to Stay; Denying Without Prejudice 13 Motion to Certify Interlocutory Appeal; Denying 2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Terrance Alfonzo Dudley (Written Opinion). Signed by Senior Judge David S. Doty on 6/10/2014. (PJM)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA TERRANCE ALFONZO DUDLEY, Plaintiff, Civil No. 13-2737 (DSD/JJG) v. EDDIE MILES, TOM ROY, PAIGE LEMAY, JOSEPH LANGEVIN, ADAM LYNCH, ROSEMARY ANDREWS, JOHN RATCLIFFE, JOHN WING, CRAIG S. OSELAND, RICK RAVEN, LCIE STEVENSON, JO EARHART, SHANNON REIMANN, MATTHEW PETERSON, DAN GRZYWINSKI, MICHELLE HALLMAN, MR. GULLETTE and FRANK BARR, ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Defendants. The above-entitled matter came before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation are ADOPTED; 2. Plaintiff=s applications to proceed in forma pauperis, (Docket Nos. 2 and 6), is DENIED; 3. Plaintiff=s motion for appointment of counsel, (Docket No. 12), is DENIED; 4. Plaintiff=s Amotion requesting to proceed on an appeal,@ (Docket No. 13), is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; 5. Plaintiff=s Amotion requesting stayed petition,@ (Docket No. 14), is DENIED; and 6. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: June 10, 2014 s/David S. Doty DAVID S. DOTY, Judge United States District Court 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?