Fagen, Inc. et al v. Homeland Renewable Energy Inc.

Filing 12

ORDER: Fagen and Fagen Engineering's Motion for Entry of Default Judgment 5 is DENIED. The hearing on February 18, 2014, at 9:30 a.m. is CANCELLED. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on February 10, 2014. (CBC)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Fagen, Inc., and Fagen Engineering LLC, Plaintiffs, v. Civil No. 13-2833 (JNE/JJG) ORDER Homeland Renewable Energy Inc., Defendant. This is an action for breach of contract and unjust enrichment brought by Fagen, Inc., and Fagen Engineering LLC against Homeland Renewable Energy Inc. The case is before the Court on Fagen and Fagen Engineering’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b). For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies the motion. “When a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend, and that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk must enter the party’s default.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). “[E]ntry of default under Rule 55(a) must precede grant of a default judgment under Rule 55(b).” Johnson v. Dayton Elec. Mfg. Co., 140 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1998). In this case, Fagen and Fagen Engineering moved for a default judgment under Rule 55(b) without obtaining the entry of Homeland Renewable Energy’s default under Rule 55(a). Consequently, the Court denies Fagen and Fagen Engineering’s motion and cancels the hearing on February 18, 2014. See id. 1 Based on the files, records, and proceedings herein, and for the reasons stated above, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Fagen and Fagen Engineering’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment [Docket No. 5] is DENIED. 2. The hearing on February 18, 2014, at 9:30 a.m. is CANCELLED. Dated: February 10, 2014 s/Joan N. Ericksen JOAN N. ERICKSEN United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?