Erdmann v. Hanson et al

Filing 6

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 4 Report and Recommendation, 2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Charles Edward Erdmann. 1. Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau's January 13, 2014 Re port and Recommendation (Doc. No. 4 ) is ADOPTED. 2. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 3. Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 2 ) is DENIED AS MOOT.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 1/28/2014. (BJS)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Charles Edward Erdmann,

Civil No. 13-2982 (DWF/SER)

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION

Jeff Hanson; Thor Howe, Lakeville Police
Department; Jason Haider, Lakeville Police
Department; Agent Phil Windschitl, Dakota
County; Agent Matt Wayne, Dakota County;
Agent Casey Smith, Dakota County; Agent Dan
Bianconi, Dakota County; Agent Bryan Schowalter,
Dakota County; Agent Jeremiah Simonson,
Dakota County; Agent Jeff Thul, Dakota County;
Agent Tom Booth, Dakota County; Agent John
Decker, Dakota County; Agent Cassie Redmond,
Dakota County; Agent Derek Schultz, Dakota
County; Agent Chris Roche, Dakota County;
Agent Blake Pederson, Dakota County; and
Agent John Larrive, Dakota County,
Defendants.

The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation
of United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau dated January 13, 2014. (Doc. No. 4.)
No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period
permitted. The factual background for the above-entitled matter is clearly and precisely
set forth in the Report and Recommendation and is incorporated by reference. Based

upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and upon all of the files,
records, and proceedings herein, the Court now makes and enters the following:
ORDER
1.

Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau’s January 13, 2014 Report and

Recommendation (Doc. No. [4]) is ADOPTED.
2.

This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

3.

Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. [2]) is

DENIED AS MOOT.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: January 28, 2014

s/Donovan W. Frank
DONOVAN W. FRANK
United States District Judge

2