Traub v. Saint Paul, City of et al

Filing 81

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 80 Report and Recommendation(Written Opinion) 1. Defendant Cities of Saint Paul Park, Farmington, Burnsville, and Hastings Motion to Dismiss and/or Sever 14 is GRANTED in part and DENIED as moot in part. The motion to dismiss is granted and the alternative motion to sever is denied as moot; 2. Defendant Dakota County's Motion to Dismiss 21 is GRANTED; 3. Defendant City of Saint Paul's Motion to Dismiss 47 is GRANTED in part and D ENIED as moot in part. The motion to dismiss is granted and the alternative motion to sever is denied as moot; 4. Defendants Aitkin and Sherburne Counties' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 51 is GRANTED; and 5. This matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.(KMW)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Laurie M. Traub,

Civil No. 13-3017 MJD/JJK
Plaintiff,
ORDER ON
DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS
TO DISMISS

v.
City of Saint Paul, City of Saint
Paul Park, City of Hastings,
City of Farmington, City of
Burnsville, County of Aitkin,
County of Dakota, County of
Sherburne and John Does 1-8.,
Defendants.

A.L. Brown, Esq., Capitol City Law Group, LLC, counsel for the Plaintiff;
Adam Matthew Niblick, Esq., Saint Paul City Attorney’s Office, counsel for
Defendant City of Saint Paul;
Stephanie A. Angolkar, Esq., Iverson Reuvers Condon, counsel for
Defendant Cities of Saint Paul Park, Farmington, Burnsville, and Hastings;
Margaret A. Skelton, Esq., Ratwik Roszak & Maloney, counsel for
Defendants Aitkin County and Sherburne County;
Amelia N. Jadoo, Esq., Dakota County Attorneys’ Office, counsel for
Defendant Dakota County.

Based upon the Report and Recommendation by United States
Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes dated June 6, 2014, with all the files and
records, and no objections having been filed to said Recommendation, IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant Cities of Saint Paul Park, Farmington, Burnsville, and
Hastings Motion to Dismiss and/or Sever (Docket No. 14) is GRANTED in part
and DENIED as moot in part. The motion to dismiss is granted and the
alternative motion to sever is denied as moot;
2. Defendant Dakota County’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 21) is
GRANTED;
3. Defendant City of Saint Paul’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 47) is
GRANTED in part and DENIED as moot in part. The motion to dismiss is
granted and the alternative motion to sever is denied as moot;
4. Defendants Aitkin and Sherburne Counties’ Motion for Judgment
on the Pleadings (Doc. No. 51) is GRANTED; and
5. This matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

Dated: June 25, 2014

s/Michael J. Davis
Michael J. Davis
U.S. District Court Chief Judge

2