Residential Funding Company, LLC v. First Mortgage Corporation
Filing
106
ORDER in Response to 83 Defendant First Mortgage Corporation's Letter to District Judge. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 9/6/2018. (MJC)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Case No. 13-cv-3490 (SRN/HB)
Residential Funding Company, LLC,
Plaintiff,
ORDER
v.
First Mortgage Corporation,
Defendant.
Isaac Nesser and Peter Calamari, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, 51 Madison
Avenue, 22nd Floor, New York, NY 10010; Anthony Alden, Johanna Ong, and Matthew
Scheck, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, 865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor, Los
Angeles, CA 90017; Jeffrey Alan Lipps and Jennifer A.L. Battle, Carpenter Lipps & Leland
LLP, 280 Plaza, Ste. 1300, 280 N. High St., Columbus, OH 43215; Donald Heeman, Jessica
Nelson, Richard Voelbel, David Hashmall, and Ryan Olson, Felhaber Larson, 220 S. 6th
St., Ste. 2200, Minneapolis, MN 55402, for Plaintiff
Thomas Michael Sullivan, Jr., 191 Sylvestor Place, Highlands Ranch, CO 80129; Gene
Hoff and Michael Minenko, Minenko & Hoff, 5200 Wilson Rd., Ste. 150, Edina, MN
55424, for Defendant
_________________________________________________________________________
SUSAN RICHARD NELSON, United States District Judge
Before the Court is a letter from counsel for Defendant First Mortgage Corporation
(“First Mortgage”) [Doc. No. 83]. First Mortgage requests permission to file a motion in
limine to be heard at the November 16, 2018 hearing on the parties’ cross motions for
summary judgment.
First Mortgage’s request is DENIED. After the summary judgment hearing, the
Court will issue a pretrial order setting forth the deadlines for all pretrial submissions and
motions in limine. All motions in limine will be heard at a pretrial conference yet to be
scheduled by the Court before trial.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 6, 2018
s/Susan Richard Nelson
SUSAN RICHARD NELSON
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?