Residential Funding Company, LLC v. First Mortgage Corporation

Filing 106

ORDER in Response to 83 Defendant First Mortgage Corporation's Letter to District Judge. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 9/6/2018. (MJC)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Case No. 13-cv-3490 (SRN/HB) Residential Funding Company, LLC, Plaintiff, ORDER v. First Mortgage Corporation, Defendant. Isaac Nesser and Peter Calamari, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, 51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor, New York, NY 10010; Anthony Alden, Johanna Ong, and Matthew Scheck, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, 865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90017; Jeffrey Alan Lipps and Jennifer A.L. Battle, Carpenter Lipps & Leland LLP, 280 Plaza, Ste. 1300, 280 N. High St., Columbus, OH 43215; Donald Heeman, Jessica Nelson, Richard Voelbel, David Hashmall, and Ryan Olson, Felhaber Larson, 220 S. 6th St., Ste. 2200, Minneapolis, MN 55402, for Plaintiff Thomas Michael Sullivan, Jr., 191 Sylvestor Place, Highlands Ranch, CO 80129; Gene Hoff and Michael Minenko, Minenko & Hoff, 5200 Wilson Rd., Ste. 150, Edina, MN 55424, for Defendant _________________________________________________________________________ SUSAN RICHARD NELSON, United States District Judge Before the Court is a letter from counsel for Defendant First Mortgage Corporation (“First Mortgage”) [Doc. No. 83]. First Mortgage requests permission to file a motion in limine to be heard at the November 16, 2018 hearing on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. First Mortgage’s request is DENIED. After the summary judgment hearing, the Court will issue a pretrial order setting forth the deadlines for all pretrial submissions and motions in limine. All motions in limine will be heard at a pretrial conference yet to be scheduled by the Court before trial. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 6, 2018 s/Susan Richard Nelson SUSAN RICHARD NELSON United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?