Residential Funding Company, LLC v. Terrace Mortgage Company

Filing 74

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Janie S. Mayeron dated May 30, 2014 67 . 2. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint 45 is DENIED. (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 8/12/14. (GRR)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY, LLC, Plaintiff, v. ORDER Civil File No. 13-3517 (MJD/JSM) TERRACE MORTGAGE COMPANY, Defendant. David Elsberg and Peter E. Calamari, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, Donald G. Heeman and Jessica J. Nelson, Felhaber Larson, Jeffrey A. Lipps and Jennifer A.L. Battle, Carpenter Lipps & Leland LLP, Counsel for Plaintiff. Aaron P.M. Tady and Thomas M. Barton, Coles Barton LLP, C.J. Schoenwetter and John D. Sear, Bowman & Brooke LLP, Counsel for Defendant. The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Janie S. Mayeron, dated May 30, 2014. [Docket No. 67] Defendant filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. [Docket No. 70] Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review upon the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the 1 Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Mayeron dated May 30, 2014. Accordingly, based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Janie S. Mayeron dated May 30, 2014 [Docket No. 67]. 2. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint [Docket No. 45] is DENIED. Dated: August 12, 2014 s/ Michael J. Davis Michael J. Davis Chief Judge United States District Court 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?