Myers v. Roy et al

Filing 24

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 6 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 2 is SUMMARILY DISMISSED for failure to exhaust state court remedies. 2. Petitioner's Motion to Appoint Counsel 17 , and to Amend 20 and 21 are dismissed as moot. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.(Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 10/21/14. (GRR)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Todd Curtis Myers,
Petitioner,
v.

ORDER
Civil No. 14‐921 (MJD/JJK)

Tom Roy, Commissioner of
Corrections and Michelle Smith,
Warden, MCF‐Stillwater,
Respondents.
__________________________________________________________________
The above‐entitled matter comes before the Court on Petitioner’s objections
to the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes dated
June 18, 2014. 
Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the
record.  28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b).  In response to Petitioner’s
objections, Respondents have provided additional information as to Petitioner’s
parallel proceedings in state court.  Based on the Court’s de novo review and the
additional information provided by Respondents, the Court will dismiss the
Petition for Habeas Relief as Petitioner has failed to demonstrate that he has
exhausted his state court remedies. 

1

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 
1.

The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [Doc. No. 2] is SUMMARILY
DISMISSED for failure to exhaust state court remedies. 

2.

Petitioner’s Motion to Appoint Counsel [Doc. No. 17], and to Amend
[Doc. Nos. 20 and 21] are dismissed as moot.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY
Date: October 21, 2014

s/ Michael J. Davis                                  
Michael J. Davis
Chief Judge
United States District Court

2