Layton et al v. Target Corporation
Filing
12
CONDITIONAL ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. IN RE: TARGET CORPORATION CUSTOMER DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION. MDL No. 2522. Signed by Jeffery N. Luthi, Clerk of the Panel on 4/15/14. (aaa, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2014) [Transferred from California Northern on 4/18/2014.]
Cas* l"{*L Na. 2S3? #*nrlmsnt 2S$ Filed 04ll-4"114 N:age 3 *f
5
UNITED STATES JUDTCIAL PA}{EL
on
MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATIOI{
IN RE: TARGET CORPORATION CUSTOMER
DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATIG|'I
MDL No. 2522
{sEE ATTACHHD SCHEDULE)
coNDtTroNAL I'ltANSFElt
ORDrcR (CTO
-I)
April 2,2014, the Panel transt-erred 27 civil action(s) to the United States District Court fbr the
Disftfct of Minnesota for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
$1407.,!ee-_F'.Supp.2d (J.P.M.L.2014). Since that time, no additional action{s) have been
iransferred tithe District of Minnesota. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been
Orr
assigned to the Honorable Paul A Magnuson.
It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order-itrvolve questions of fact that are
common to the actions previously transf'erred to the District of Minnesota and assigrtecl to "ludge
Magnuson.
7.i of the ltules of Procedrne of the United States .ludicial Panel on Multidistrict
Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. _$ 1407 to the
Disilict of Minnesota ibr the r€asons stated in the order of April 2,20T4, ilnd, with the consent of
that court, assigned to the Honorable llaul A Magnuson.
Pursuant to Rule
'l'his order does not become et'fective until it is filed in the Otfice of the Clerk of the United States
District Court for the District of Minnesota. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be
stayed 7 tlays from the entry thereof. lf any party files a notice of'opposition^with the Clerk of the
Panel rvithin this 7-clay periclcl, the stay will be continued until flrther order of the Panel.
FOR THE PANEL:
A itui,t i
cil:"
i;l ti'
5*-,*l'ioet{s)
,, .l
.
+ls
'
-rr,-''t'i.- _--t
'.t :: ,"..l-fi.jft
':,1
",,no&.
Jell'ery N. Liithi
{llerk nf the Panel
ilase MDL No. 252? ilocument 2*S Fit*d Q4lL&t14 Pane 3 ot S
I
N
ltf
:'I'ARGE'I'
I}A'I]A
C OR POITAT ION C U S"llO M Ell,
SEC URIT'Y BI{.EACH LI'I'IGATTON
SCHEDULE CTO*I
- TAG-ALONG
MDL No. 2522
ACTIONS
CASE CAPTION
ALABAMA MiDDLE
ALM
ALM
2
r3-00939
2
l3-"00952
o7l
f
PR
Dickson, et al. v. Target Corporation I cvi
Alabama State Employees Credit Union v. Target
Corporatioir
c-v \o+5 pA
lf
tt/srt4
Uf: n
ALABAMA NOK|HERN
AtN
14-00092
iSc,
McFerrin v. Target Corporation
t
alc PAtW/::K
ARKANSAS WES |ERN
ARW
14-04012
Commercial Bancshares, Inc. r'. Target Corporation
iVcv
t0?7 PAt{,/'JT\(
CALIFORNIA CENTRAL
CAC
CAC
CAC
CAC
CAC
CAC
13-"09461
I
3-095 l9
l4-00003
14-04294
14-01450
l4-00037
Kennelyn Sue Saiz v. Target Corpcration et al ] * qv i0? 5 pA\.iS
Regina Merino v. Target Corporation i*cul o?1 p6t'1r/:s tq
Jacqueline Curllen v. Target Clorporation et al ltcl lO 66 pA tt/SS
Thonias Dorobiala et al v. Target Corporation i fcu I o51 pAtt/s:ra
Jason Kirschenstein v. Target Corporatior
pAF,1J,,i i J
y i0
k,
Ayman Mousa v. Target Corporation llf t
83 gA1r,1,/3-3-11
lI;
ga
"10
I]AI-IFORNIA EASTN,RN
l4-001 s6
CAH
Lambert v. T'arget Corporation
f
*cui 061 flAml:;te*
CAI,IFORNIA NORTI{ARN
CAN
CAN
CAN
CAN
CAN
a
3
14-00053
t4^00129
L4-04212
J
l4-00218
a
ft*}a577
J
J
J
CALIF'OITNIA SOUTHERN
Layton et al v. Target Corporation it|''r'lo I 3 PRt"nlf -x \C
Alvarez v. Target Corporation if".u i o 61 PArt
Mancias et al v. Target Corporation I?cr,lAl O PnM
/SS\C
Mongold v. Target Corporation If c" | 0 1 flAm
f<
Smith el al r.. Target Corporation
pn lf
f *cu | 6q
a
f Z_
/:T\L
|
/;:
l"ji
Zfi*
ea*e MDL N*. 25?2 *nc*ryrent
.
cAS
CAS
L 1\5
3
3
3
14-00009
1.1-0012l
14-00563
Vile.d *4lL$f
14 Fag* 3 r:{ 5
f-
Gaizo v. lfarget Corporation ltc, t 0 i '3 PAvi lT-:
Mcl.-arry et al v. Target Corporation et
i,f cv t 61+ PA11
''lt>h1 p6r^
Garclner v. Target Corporation
al
i*C,
1-r-
1a
l:*J ,,
rC
GHOITGIA NORTHERN
t
14*00222
Hawkins v. Target corporation
itl"t' i0qB ?An i331q-
ILLINOIS NOITTHBITN
rr,N
r
13-09336
f)ne Fratelli. Inc. v. Target corporation i tt
u
p7 a' P Ar^tl:: U-
ILLINOIS SOUI HEI{N
lts
3
14-000?2
Rippy
r,-.
Target Bratrds, Inc"
14.v llfrCl
Plrrl::tC-
KENTUCKY \4IESTERN
Kyw
3
14-00035
}vfeetey v. Target Corporarion
ltcul
t a I f ln
f
s: tq
LOUISIANA EASTERN
I-AH
LAH,
LAE
t';-'+
2
2
2
'l'arget
Comoration of
Barrk
14-00sT0 Nii National .T,lj*t USA r,.
l'di'p4,1 i';:\f"'""
.#il"'i
14-00662 McAdam v. Target Corporation i f cv | /0 3 PArrr f : 31(-.
14*00663 Fraser v. Target Corpr:ration fcfcv lt 0+ pAtf l:Sy_
LOUISIANA MIDDLE
r,AM
3
14-00051
Christina v. Target Corporation of Minnesota et al
l*rv lf 05
MASSACHUSE"|'I*S
l3-13296
PAm
l3:tl
Casey et al r'. TargeJ Corporation
lLlCvl\O6
PAr',\
lif
1(,-
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NI{
1
13--005ss
Raleigh v. Target Ccqroration
rtcv
ll03
Pnrrlsr
rc_
NEW JERSEY
NJz
r
3-07866
lhc v
NHW MHXICT)
u-44292
NEW YORK EASTERN
NYE
1
SANTOS et al v. TAIIGETCORPORATION et al
14-0033t{
NEW YOITK SOUTHERN
1
1
61
PApr
lJr
l(*
Animas Credit Union v. Target Corporation
tle,u i t]
p 6,4
11
I
/::
o
Pietanza et al v. Target Corporation et al
Itcu lll
\
fAlt
/5:tl/-
tas* ld*L
NYS
,
fr}*. ?5??. ilocument
I
l3-09119
2**
Yilerj {}4f LA'|L& F;egc 4 nf
S
Bar:tlow v-'l*arget Corpor;rtion
Pnr' 1-ss
t *cv l\ t
t1
2
NORTI{ C]AROI,INA MIDDI,N
NCM
14*00042
I
NOITTH CAI{O LINA WESTEI{N
NCW 3
14-00022
)l\{-
Knox v. Target Co4roralion
l+r,Jlll+ YAI'1[fSt(-
NOI{T'H DAKOTA
3
BRYANT v. TARGET CORPORATION Kct D
ltcuitt3 fl Artl
14-0001 I
Farol et al v. Target Corporation
13-02850
Mannion v. Target Corporation
rriG PArr :sv_
i11+ u
f
ifrui t\5 PAn\55\z-
OHIO NOKI'HEI{N
oIrN
1
OKTAHOMA NORTHERN
oKN
4
14-"00083
Noe v. Talset Corporation
i tcu t t
PAnl'1r tL
(7
PENNSYI'VANIA EA STERN
PAE
2
14-00209
tVt,'r\tl8 PA*'lIJ\(
PENNSYI,VANIA M]I]NLE
PAM
1
ELLISON v. I]ARGET CORPOI{A"|ION et al
14-00544
Bankers Trust Company v. Target Corporatiern
PAn (f :r \{.*
jqr.ir \r
\t
PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN
PAW
2
14-00146
PAW
2
1
4-001 75
l?c.ull4l PAul:::4
SOUTI.I CAROI,INA
sc
4
FIRST CIFTOICE FF.DERAI. CREDIT UNION v.
TARGET CIORPORATION I t i-r' \ l? O f'Rt"f l:: t
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?