Moua v. State of Minnesota et al

Filing 10

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS denying 1 Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus, denying 3 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Por Moua, and dismissing this case without prejudice (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on September 17, 2014. (HAZ)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA POR MOUA, Petitioner, Civil File No: 14-3158 (JRT/SER) v. STATE OF MINNESOTA and RAMSEY COUNTY, Respondents. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Por Moua, 203392, MCF-Moose Lake, 1000 Lakeshore Drive, Moose Lake, MN 55767, pro se petitioner, Peter R. Marker, OFFICE OF THE RAMSEY COUNTY ATTORNEY, 50 Kellogg Boulevard West, Suite 315, St Paul, MN 55102-1657, for respondent. James Early and Matthew Frank, MINNESOTA ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE, 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 1800, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101, for respondent. The above-captioned case comes before the undersigned on the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau. No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed within the requisite time period. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner Por Moua’s application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 [Docket No. 1] be DENIED. 2. Moua’s application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [Docket No. 3] be DENIED. 3. This action be summarily DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of jurisdiction. 4. Moua not be granted a certificate of appealability. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: September 17, 2014 at Minneapolis, Minnesota. s/John R. Tunheim s JOHN R. TUNHEIM United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?