Richmond v. State of Minnesota et al

Filing 5

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. 1. Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois's October 6, 2014 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 4 ) is ADOPTED. 2. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute. 3. Plaintiff Courtney Richmond's application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 2 ) is DENIED AS MOOT. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 11/5/2014. (BJS)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Courtney Richmond, Civil No. 14-3190 (DWF/LIB) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION State of Minnesota, Office of the Governor State Capital; Attorney General Office; Hennepin County Medical Center; and Hennepin County Jail, Defendants. The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois dated October 6, 2014. (Doc. No. 4.) No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. The factual background for the above-entitled matter is clearly and precisely set forth in the Report and Recommendation and is incorporated by reference. Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and upon all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, the Court now makes and enters the following: ORDER 1. Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois’s October 6, 2014 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. [4]) is ADOPTED. 2. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute. 3. Plaintiff Courtney Richmond’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. [2]) is DENIED AS MOOT. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: November 5, 2014 s/Donovan W. Frank DONOVAN W. FRANK United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?