Washington v. Mark et al
Filing
7
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. 1. Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau's September 5, 2014 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 6 ) is ADOPTED. 2. Plaintiff Theron Preston Washington's application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 2 ) is DENIED. 3. Plaintiff Theron Preston Washington's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. No. 3 ) is DENIED AS MOOT. 4. The complaint is SUMMARILY DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 10/1/2014. (BJS)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Theron Preston Washington,
Civil No. 14-3209 (DWF/SER)
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION
Mr. Mark and Volunteer of America,
Defendant.
The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation
of United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau dated September 5, 2014. No objections
have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. The
factual background for the above-entitled matter is clearly and precisely set forth in the
Report and Recommendation and is incorporated by reference. Based upon the Report
and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and upon all of the files, records, and
proceedings herein, the Court now makes and enters the following:
ORDER
1.
Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau’s September 5, 2014 Report and
Recommendation (Doc. No. [6]) is ADOPTED.
2.
Plaintiff Theron Preston Washington’s application to proceed
in forma pauperis (Doc. No. [2]) is DENIED.
3.
Plaintiff Theron Preston Washington’s motion for judgment on the
pleadings (Doc. No. [3]) is DENIED AS MOOT.
4.
The complaint is SUMMARILY DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: October 1, 2014
s/Donovan W. Frank
DONOVAN W. FRANK
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?