Washington v. Mark et al

Filing 7

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. 1. Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau's September 5, 2014 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 6 ) is ADOPTED. 2. Plaintiff Theron Preston Washington's application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 2 ) is DENIED. 3. Plaintiff Theron Preston Washington's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. No. 3 ) is DENIED AS MOOT. 4. The complaint is SUMMARILY DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 10/1/2014. (BJS)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Theron Preston Washington, Civil No. 14-3209 (DWF/SER) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Mr. Mark and Volunteer of America, Defendant. The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau dated September 5, 2014. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. The factual background for the above-entitled matter is clearly and precisely set forth in the Report and Recommendation and is incorporated by reference. Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and upon all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, the Court now makes and enters the following: ORDER 1. Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau’s September 5, 2014 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. [6]) is ADOPTED. 2. Plaintiff Theron Preston Washington’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. [2]) is DENIED. 3. Plaintiff Theron Preston Washington’s motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. No. [3]) is DENIED AS MOOT. 4. The complaint is SUMMARILY DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: October 1, 2014 s/Donovan W. Frank DONOVAN W. FRANK United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?