Propotnik v. Minn. Dept. of Corrections et al

Filing 16

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation 13 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner's Eighth Amendment claims in Ground Two of the Petition be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on October 27, 2014. (CLG) cc: Propotnik on 10/27/2014 (JAM).

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Larry R. Propotnik, Civil No. 14-3799 (PJS/JJK) Petitioner, v. ORDER Minn. Dept. of Corrections; Tom Roy, Commissioner, MCF-RC; and Warden Steve Hammer; Respondents. Larry R. Propotnik, 104328, MN Correctional Facility, MCF – RC 7600 525th Street, Rush City, MN 55069, Petitioner, pro se. Matthew Frank, Esq., and James B. Early, Esq., Minnesota Attorney General's Office, 445 Minnesota St., Ste 1800, St Paul, MN 55101, counsel for Respondents. The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes dated October 1, 2014. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. Based on the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, on all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, the Court now makes and enters the following Order. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner’s Eighth Amendment claims in Ground Two of the Petition be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Date: 10/27/14 s/Patrick J. Schiltz Patrick J. Schiltz United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?