Dubynskyy v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security & Immigration Customs Enforcement
Filing
14
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. 1. Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes's March 2, 2015 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 12 ) is ADOPTED. 2. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED (Doc. No. 9 ). 3. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED AS MOOT (Doc. No. 1 ). 4. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 4/17/2015. (BJS) cc: Petitioner. Modified on 4/17/2015 (lmb).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Tymur Dubnyskyy,
Civil No. 14-5025 (DWF/JJK)
Petitioner,
v.
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
& Immigration Customs Enforcement,
Respondent.
The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation
of United States Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes dated March 2, 2015. (Doc. No. 12.)
No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period
permitted. Further, mail sent to Petitioner was returned as undeliverable and the Court
did attempt to locate Petitioner, but was unable to do so. (See generally ECF Docket.)
The factual background for the above-entitled matter is clearly and precisely set
forth in the Report and Recommendation and is incorporated by reference. Based upon
the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and upon all of the files,
records, and proceedings herein, the Court now makes and enters the following:
ORDER
1.
Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes’s March 2, 2015 Report and
Recommendation (Doc. No. [12]) is ADOPTED.
2.
Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED (Doc. No. [9]).
3.
The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED AS MOOT (Doc.
No. [1]).
4.
This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Dated: April 17, 2015
s/Donovan W. Frank
DONOVAN W. FRANK
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?