Advanced Health Strategies, Inc et al v. United States

Filing 19

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation 18 : Petitioners' Petition to Quash Third Party Summons 1 is DENIED. Respondent's Motion to Summarily Deny Petition to Quash IRS Summonses 8 is GRANTED. This proceeding is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on January 13, 2015. (CBC)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Advanced Health Strategies, Inc., Guy W. Anderson, and Theresa A. Anderson, Petitioners, v. No. 14-mc-51 (JNE/FLN) ORDER United States, Respondent. In the course of investigating the federal income tax liabilities of Petitioners Advanced Health Strategies, Inc., Guy W. Anderson, and Theresa A. Anderson, an agent of the United States Internal Revenue Service issued three third-party summonses under the authority provided by 26 U.S.C. § 7602. The Petitioners subsequently commenced this proceeding by filing a petition to quash those summonses in accordance with 26 U.S.C. § 7609(b). ECF No. 1. The United States responded with a motion to summarily deny the petition. ECF No. 8. The United States Magistrate Judge heard argument and issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the Petitioners’ petition be denied, that the United States’ motion be granted, and that this matter be dismissed with prejudice. ECF No. 18. No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed. The Court, having conducted a de novo review of the record, now adopts the Report and Recommendation. 1 Based on the files, records, and proceedings herein, and for the reasons discussed above, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Petitioners’ Petition to Quash Third Party Summons [ECF No. 1] is DENIED. 2. Respondent’s Motion to Summarily Deny Petition to Quash IRS Summonses [ECF No. 8] is GRANTED. 3. This proceeding is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: January 13, 2015 s/Joan N. Ericksen JOAN N. ERICKSEN United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?