Haggins v. Ramsey County et al
Filing
121
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. 1. Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Mendendez's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 119 ) is ADOPTED. 2. Defendants' Second Motion to Dismiss as Discovery Sanction (Doc. No. 111 ) is DENIED WITHOUT P REJUDICE. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 11/20/2017. (BJS)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
DeJuan Haywood Haggins,
Civil No. 15-59 (DWF/KMM)
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION
Ramsey County; Scott Brommerich,
Ramsey County Corrections Officer; C.O.
Whipps, Ramsey County Corrections Officer;
C.O. Reniteria, Ramsey County Corrections
Officer; C.O. Frerichs, Ramsey County
Corrections Officer; and Sgt. Sontoya, Ramsey
County Corrections Officer,
Defendants.
The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation
of United States Magistrate Judge Katerine M. Menendez dated October 23, 2017. (Doc.
No. 119.) While no objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the
time period permitted, the Court does acknowledge that since the filing of the Report and
Recommendation, Plaintiff has filed a reply to Defendants’ letter dated October 11, 2017
(Doc. No. 117). (Doc. No. 120.) The factual background for the above-entitled matter is
clearly and precisely set forth in the Report and Recommendation and is incorporated by
reference. Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and
upon all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, the Court now makes and enters the
following:
ORDER
1.
Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Mendendez’s Report and Recommendation
(Doc. No. [119]) is ADOPTED.
2.
Defendants’ Second Motion to Dismiss as Discovery Sanction (Doc. No.
[111]) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Dated: November 20, 2017
s/Donovan W. Frank
DONOVAN W. FRANK
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?