Sieff v. Juell et al
Filing
92
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The City of Chaska is REINSTATED as a Defendant in this matter; 2. The judgment in favor of Sieff and against Juell 71 is WITHDRAWN; 3. Defendant Brady Juell is DISMISSED; 4. Judgment is entered in favor of Sie ff and against the City of Chaska in the amount of $1,000,001.01; 5. The City of Chaska shall pay Sieff $700,000 in attorney's fees and $50,000 to settle the Section 1988 claim; 6. Sieff's Motion for Attorney's Fees 72 is DENIED without prejudice; and 7. This matter is DISMISSED with prejudice and without any additional costs, disbursements, or attorney's fees to any party. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Signed by The Hon. Paul A. Magnuson on 05/23/2017. (LLM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Philip Sieff, as Trustee for the
next-of-kin of Dawn Marie Pfister,
Case No. 15-cv-419 (PAM/DTS)
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
Brady Juell,
and the City of Chaska,
Defendants.
___________________________________________________________
This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal with
Prejudice. (Docket No. 91.) On January 11, 2017, pursuant to the parties’ stipulation of
partial dismissal, the Court dismissed Count Two of the Complaint and terminated
Defendant City of Chaska from this matter. (Docket No. 55.) On April 17, 2017,
Plaintiff Philip Sieff, as Trustee for the next-of-kin of Dawn Marie Pfister, accepted
Defendant Brady Juell’s Rule 68 Offer of Judgment. (Docket No. 70.) The Clerk entered
judgment in Sieff’s favor in the amount of $1,000,001.01 the next day. (Docket No. 71.)
Sieff also filed a motion for attorney’s fees. (Docket No. 72.)
The parties now seek to change the terms of their initial settlement. On May 9,
2017, the parties reached a separate agreement regarding the resolution Sieff’s claims and
motion for attorney’s fees. The City of Chaska and the League of Minnesota Cities
Insurance Trust (“LMCIT”) agree to pay $1,000,001.01 to Sieff under the terms of the
previously accepted Rule 68 Offer of Judgment for full and final satisfaction of all of
Sieff’s claims. Sieff agrees to withdraw his motion for attorney’s fees and the City of
Chaska and LMCIT agree to pay Sieff $700,000 in attorney’s fees and $50,000 to settle
Sieff’s 42 U.S.C. § 1988 claim. The parties request that the Court dismiss Juell from this
matter and withdraw the earlier judgment against him. The parties also request that the
Court reinstate the City of Chaska as a Defendant, enter judgment in favor of Sieff and
against the City of Chaska in the amount of $1,000,001.01, and dismiss this case with
prejudice and without any additional costs or disbursements to any of the parties.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.
The City of Chaska is REINSTATED as a Defendant in this matter;
2.
The judgment in favor of Sieff and against Juell (Docket No. 71) is
WITHDRAWN;
3.
Defendant Brady Juell is DISMISSED;
4.
Judgment is entered in favor of Sieff and against the City of Chaska in the
amount of $1,000,001.01;
5.
The City of Chaska shall pay Sieff $700,000 in attorney’s fees and $50,000
to settle the § 1988 claim;
6.
Sieff’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees (Docket No. 72) is DENIED without
prejudice; and
2
7.
This matter is DISMISSED with prejudice and without any additional
costs, disbursements, or attorney’s fees to any party.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: May 23, 2017
s/ Paul A. Magnuson
Paul A. Magnuson
United States District Court Judge
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?