Beane v. Officer Wolf et al

Filing 12

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. 1. This action is SUMMARILY DISMISSED under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). 2. Plaintiff Tiron Beane's applications to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. Nos. 2 & 5 ) are DENIED.3. Plaintiff Tiron Be ane's motion for a subpoena (Doc. No. 3 ) is DENIED AS MOOT. 4. Plaintiff Tiron Beane's request to waive the initial partial filing fee is DENIED AS MOOT. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 5/5/2015. (BJS) cc: Plaintiff. Modified on 5/5/2015 (lmb).

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Tiron Beane, Civil No. 15-424 (DWF/LIB) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Officer Wolf, Sgt. Rewizer; Lt. VanRamm; Capt. Johnson; and A/W/O/ Titus, Defendants. The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois dated April 1, 2015. (Doc. No. 11.) No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. The factual background for the above-entitled matter is clearly and precisely set forth in the Report and Recommendation and is incorporated by reference. Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and upon all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, the Court now makes and enters the following: ORDER 1. Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois’s April 1, 2015 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. [11]) is ADOPTED. 1. This action is SUMMARILY DISMISSED under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). 2. Plaintiff Tiron Beane’s applications to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. Nos. [2] & [5]) are DENIED. 3. Plaintiff Tiron Beane’s motion for a subpoena (Doc. No. [3]) is DENIED AS MOOT. 4. Plaintiff Tiron Beane’s request to waive the initial partial filing fee is DENIED AS MOOT. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: May 5, 2015 s/Donovan W. Frank DONOVAN W. FRANK United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?