Beane v. Walker et al
Filing
8
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. 1. Plaintiff Tiron Beane's Motion to Waive Initial Partial Filing Fee (Doc. No. 6 ) is GRANTED. 2. Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes's April 3, 2015 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 7 ) is ADOP TED. 3. Plaintiff Tiron Beane's claims under § 1983 are SUMMARILY DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). 4. Plaintiff Tiron Beane's remaining state-law claims are SUMMARILY DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 5/12/2015. (BJS)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Tiron Beane,
Civil No. 15-567 (DWF/JJK)
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION
Walker Law Offices P.A.; William L.
Walker; and Kenya C. Bodden,
Defendants.
The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation
of United States Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes dated April 3, 2015. (Doc. No. 7.)
No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period
permitted. The factual background for the above-entitled matter is clearly and precisely
set forth in the Report and Recommendation and is incorporated by reference.
Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and upon
all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, the Court now makes and enters the
following:
ORDER
1.
Plaintiff Tiron Beane’s Motion to Waive Initial Partial Filing Fee (Doc.
No. [6]) is GRANTED.
2.
Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes’s April 3, 2015 Report and
Recommendation (Doc. No. [7]) is ADOPTED.
3.
Plaintiff Tiron Beane’s claims under § 1983 are SUMMARILY
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).
4.
Plaintiff Tiron Beane’s remaining state-law claims are SUMMARILY
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: May 12, 2015
s/Donovan W. Frank
DONOVAN W. FRANK
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?