Frost v. Nicklin

Filing 4

ORDER: Frost's petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 [Docket No. 1 ] is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; and Frost's motion for appointment of counsel [Docket No. 2 ] is DENIED as moot. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on May 27, 2015. (CBC)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Coquette April Frost,
Petitioner,
v.

Civ. No. 15-1635 (JNE/BRT)
ORDER

Julie Nicklin, Warden,
Respondent.

This matter is before the Court on a Report and Recommendation issued by the
Honorable Becky R. Thorson, United States Magistrate Judge, on April 27, 2015. No objections
to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. The Court has conducted a de novo review
of the record. See D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). Based on that review, the Court adopts the Report and
Recommendation [Docket No. 3].
Therefore, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1.

Frost’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241
[Docket No. 1] is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject
matter jurisdiction; and

2.

Frost’s motion for appointment of counsel [Docket No. 2] is DENIED as
moot.

Dated: May 27, 2015
s/Joan N. Ericksen
JOAN N. ERICKSEN
United States District Judge