Weber v. Colvin

Filing 23

ORDER re 20 Report and Recommendation. (1) Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 15 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. (2) The Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment 17 is DENIED. (3) The Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED as to steps one through two and VACATED as to steps three through five. (4) The case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on February 2, 2017. (CBC)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Donald W. Weber, Plaintiff, Case No. 16-cv-332 (JNE/TNL) ORDER v. Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Defendant. In a Report and Recommendation dated January 26, 2017, the Honorable Tony N. Leung, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment be granted in part and denied in part, that the Commissioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment be denied, that the Commissioner’s decision be affirmed as to steps one through two and vacated as to steps three through five, and that the case be remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings. The parties stated that they do not object to the Report and Recommendation. The Court accepts the recommended disposition [Docket No. 20]. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 15] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. 2. The Commissioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 17] is DENIED. 3. The Commissioner’s decision is AFFIRMED as to steps one through two and VACATED as to steps three through five. 1 Nancy A. Berryhill is automatically substituted for Carolyn W. Colvin as the defendant in this case. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d). 1 4. The case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: February 2, 2017 s/ Joan N. Ericksen JOAN N. ERICKSEN United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?