Newcomb v. City of Anoka et al

Filing 52

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation 49 . Plaintiff Tylon Larrice Newcomb's motion for default judgment 18 is DENIED. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on February 3, 2017. (CBC)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA TYLON LARRICE NEWCOMB, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 16-CV-811 (JNE/FLN) ORDER CITY OF ANOKA, SGT. DAVID HUTCHINSON, in their individual and official capacities, OFC. CANON YANG, in their individual and official capacities, OFC. ANDREW CARLSON, in their individual and official capacities, OFC. JORDAN TRAMMEL, in their individual and official capacities, and CAROLINE PRUTER, in their individual and official capacities, Defendants. This matter is before the Court on a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) issued by the Honorable Franklin L. Noel, United States Magistrate Judge, on January 10, 2017. (Docket No. 49.) The R&R recommends denying Plaintiff Tylon Larrice Newcomb’s motion for default judgment (Dkt No. 18). Neither party objected to the R&R. Nevertheless, the Court conducted a de novo review of the record. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b)(3). Based on that review, the Court accepts the R&R’s recommended disposition. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiff Tylon Larrice Newcomb’s motion for default judgment [Dkt No. 18] is DENIED. Dated: February 3, 2017. s/Joan N. Ericksen JOAN N. ERICKSEN United States District Judge 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?