Aase v. Roy
Filing
22
The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson dated May 1, 2017 16 . Respondent's Motion to Dismiss 7 is GRANTED. Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 1 is DENIED. The Court denies a Certificate of Appealability in this case. This matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 6/27/17. (KMW)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
JEFFREY NICHOLAS AASE,
Petitioner,
v.
THOMAS ROY, Commissioner of
Corrections,
Respondent.
ORDER
Civil File No. 16‐3101 (MJD/BRT)
Jeffrey Nicholas Aase, pro se.
Greg T. Kryzer, Assistant Wright County Attorney, Counsel for Respondent.
The above‐entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson dated May
1, 2017. Petitioner Jeffrey Nicholas Aase filed objections to the Report and
Recommendation.
Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review upon the
record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the
Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge
Thorson dated May 1, 2017.
1
Accordingly, based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED:
1. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson dated May 1, 2017 [Docket No. 16].
2. Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 7] is GRANTED.
3. Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [Docket No.1] is
DENIED.
4. The Court denies a Certificate of Appealability in this case.
5. This matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: June 27, 2017
s/Michael J. Davis
Michael J. Davis
United States District Court
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?