QFO Labs, Inc. v. Parrot S.A. et al
Filing
58
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS granting #14 Motion to Dismiss/General filed by Parrot, Inc. (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on June 19, 2017. (HAZ)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
QFO LABS, INC.,
Civil No. 16-3443 (JRT/HB)
Plaintiff,
v.
PARROT, INC., et al,
ORDER ON REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION
Defendants.
Bryan Feldhaus, Phillip Cole, LOMMEN ABDO, PA, 1000 International
Centre, 920 Second Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55402, Charles De La
Garza, THE LAW OFFICES OF CHAZ DE LA GARZA, 900 IDS
Center, 80 South Eighth Street, Minneapolis, MN 55402, for plaintiff,
Katherine Rahlin, Grant Fairbairn, FREDRIKSON & BYRON, PA, 200
South Sixth Street, Suite 4000, Minneapolis, MN 55402-1425, James Glass,
Matthew A. Traupman, QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP, 51 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10010, for
defendants.
A Report and Recommendation was filed by the Magistrate Judge on May 26,
2017. No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation in the time
period permitted.
Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all the
files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED;
2. Defendant Parrot Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Transfer or
Stay [Doc. No. 14] is GRANTED; and
3. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
DATED: June 19, 2017
at Minneapolis, Minnesota
s/John R. Tunheim
JOHN R. TUNHEIM
Chief Judge
United States District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?