QFO Labs, Inc. v. Parrot S.A. et al

Filing 58

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS granting 14 Motion to Dismiss/General filed by Parrot, Inc. (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on June 19, 2017. (HAZ)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA QFO LABS, INC., Civil No. 16-3443 (JRT/HB) Plaintiff, v. PARROT, INC., et al, ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Defendants. Bryan Feldhaus, Phillip Cole, LOMMEN ABDO, PA, 1000 International Centre, 920 Second Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55402, Charles De La Garza, THE LAW OFFICES OF CHAZ DE LA GARZA, 900 IDS Center, 80 South Eighth Street, Minneapolis, MN 55402, for plaintiff, Katherine Rahlin, Grant Fairbairn, FREDRIKSON & BYRON, PA, 200 South Sixth Street, Suite 4000, Minneapolis, MN 55402-1425, James Glass, Matthew A. Traupman, QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP, 51 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10010, for defendants. A Report and Recommendation was filed by the Magistrate Judge on May 26, 2017. No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED; 2. Defendant Parrot Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Transfer or Stay [Doc. No. 14] is GRANTED; and 3. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. DATED: June 19, 2017 at Minneapolis, Minnesota s/John R. Tunheim JOHN R. TUNHEIM Chief Judge United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?