Hamilton-Warwick v. Verizon Wireless et al

Filing 41

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS granting 11 Motion to Dismiss/General filed by Federal Trade Commission, and granting 20 Motion to Stay, Motion to Compel Arbitration filed by Verizon Wireless (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on May 3, 2017. (HAZ)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA AMY HAMILTON-WARWICK, Civil No. 16-3461 (JRT/BRT) Plaintiff, v. VERIZON WIRELESS and FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Defendants. Amy Hamilton-Warwick, 306 Exchange Street South, Saint Paul, MN 55102, pro se plaintiff. Seth J S Leventhal, LEVENTHAL PLLC, 527 Marquette Avenue South, #2100, Minneapolis, MN 55402, for defendant Verizon Wireless. Pamela Marentette, Assistant United States Attorney, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, 300 South Fourth Street, Suite 600, Minneapolis, MN 55415, for defendant Federal Trade Commission. The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson dated April 12, 2017. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, upon all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, the Court now makes and enters the following Order. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Federal Trade Commission’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim upon which Relief may be Granted (Doc. No. 11) is GRANTED, and all claims in the Complaint are dismissed without prejudice against the FTC; and 2. Verizon Wireless’s Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay the Action (Doc. No. 20) is GRANTED, and this action is STAYED pending arbitration. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: May 3, 2017 at Minneapolis, Minnesota s/John R. Tunheim JOHN R. TUNHEIM Chief Judge United States District Court 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?