Moore v. Berryhill
Filing
23
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 21 Report and Recommendation (Written Opinion). Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 15 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 18 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; and This matter is REMANDED pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with the underlying Report and Recommendation. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 1/11/18. (KMW) c/c to SSA. Modified on 1/11/2018 (lmb).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Aron Robert Moore,
Civ. No. 16-3585 (MJD/BRT)
Plaintiff,
v.
Nancy A. Berryhill,
ORDER
Acting Commissioner of
Social Security,
Defendant.
David F Chermol, Esq., Chermol & Fishman LLC; Edward C. Olson, Esq., Disability
Attorneys of Minnesota, counsel for Plaintiff.
Pamela Marentette, Esq., United States Attorney’s Office, counsel for Defendant.
The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation
of United States Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson dated December 12, 2017. No
objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period
permitted. Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, upon all
of the files, records, and proceedings herein, the Court now makes and enters the
following Order.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 15) is GRANTED IN
PART and DENIED IN PART;
2.
Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 18) is GRANTED
IN PART and DENIED IN PART; and
3.
This matter is REMANDED pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C.
§ 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with the underlying Report and
Recommendation.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Date: January 11, 2018
s/Michael J. Davis
MICHAEL J. DAVIS
United States District Court Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?