Richardson v. Alcon Laboratories, Inc.

Filing 15

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: Defendant Alcon Laboratories, Inc.'s Partial Motion to Dismiss 5 is DENIED. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 2/1/17. (GRR)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA CHERI RICHARDSON, Plaintiff, v. ORDER Civil File No. 16-3697 (MJD/HB) ALCON LABORATORIES, INC., Defendant. Eric D. Satre, Satre Law Firm, Counsel for Plaintiff. Charles F. Knapp and Jonathan E. Simpson, Faegre Baker Daniels LLP, Counsel for Defendant. This matter is before the Court on Defendant Alcon Laboratories, Inc.’s Partial Motion to Dismiss. [Docket No. 5] After a careful review of the motion and the record in this case, the Court concludes that oral argument is unnecessary. Therefore, the Court cancels the oral argument set for February 2, 2017, grants permission to Plaintiff to file the Second Amended Complaint [Docket No. 12], and denies the motion to dismiss. Accordingly, based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1 Defendant Alcon Laboratories, Inc.’s Partial Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 5] is DENIED. Dated: February 1, 2017 s/ Michael J. Davis Michael J. Davis United States District Court 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?