Hines v. Smith et al

Filing 190

ORDER granting 151 Motion to Dismiss/General; denying 164 Motion to Alter/Amend/Supplement Pleadings; adopting Report and Recommendations re 181 Report and Recommendation. (Written Opinion) Signed by Senior Judge David S. Doty on 1/16/2019. (DLO) cc: Fredrick Dewayne Hines. Modified text on 1/16/2019 (JLB).

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Civil No. 16-3797(DSD/SER) Fredrick Dewayne Hines, Plaintiff, v. ORDER Michelle Smith Warden, “MNDOC” Oak Park Heights; Tammy Wherely, Associate Warden Administration; David Reishus, Associate Warden Operation; Shar Mike, Program Director ACU/CX-5 Units; Sherilinda Wheeler, Program Director; Unknown Magadanz, Lieutenant ACI/CX-5, CX-7 Units; and Dan Meyer, Lieutenant ACU-CX-5 Units, individually and in their official capacities, Defendants. This matter is before the court upon the report and recommendation (R&R) of Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau, dated December 20, 2018. The magistrate judge recommended that the court grant defendants’ motion to dismiss and deny plaintiffs’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint. No objections to the R&R have been filed within the time period permitted. 72.2(b)(1). Under these circumstances, the See D. Minn. LR court finds appropriate to adopt the R&R. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The R&R [ECF No. 181] is adopted in its entirety; 2. The motion to dismiss [ECF No. 151] is granted; it 3. The motion for leave to file an amended complaint [ECF No. 164] is denied; and 4. The action is dismissed with prejudice. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: January 16, 2019 s/David S. Doty David S. Doty, Judge United States District Court 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?