Gearhart et al v. Heart et al

Filing 15

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 8 . IT IS ORDERED: 1. These actions are SUMMARILY DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). 2. Motion for an attorney and an extension of time (Civil File No. 16-4035 (M JD/LIB) 9 ) is DENIED because neither the motion nor the supporting memorandum provides any basis for granting the motion; and all other pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT 2 , 3 , 4 , and 13 . 3. Raymond Lee Gearhart is restricted from filin g new cases in this District unless he is represented by counsel or receives prior written authorization from a judicial officer in this District. 4. Judgment is entered accordingly. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 4/6/17. (GRR) cc: Gearheart. Modified on 4/6/2017 (lmb).

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * RAYMOND LEE GEARHART, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff, v. Case No. 16-CV-4035 (MJD/LIB) DR. HEART, et al., Defendants. RAYMOND LEE GEARHART, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 17-CV-0215 (MJD/LIB) DR. HEART, psychiatrist, et al., Defendants. RAYMOND LEE GEARHART, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 17-CV-0507 (MJD/LIB) DR. HEART and DR. GABLE, Defendants. RAYMOND LEE GEARHART, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 17-CV-0624 (MJD/LIB) DR. HEART, psychologist, et al., Defendants. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Based upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois, and after an independent review of the files, records and proceedings in the above-titled matter, IT IS ORDERED: 1. These actions are SUMMARILY DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(e)(2)(B). 2. Motion for an attorney and an extension of time (Civil File No. 16-4035 (MJD/LIB) [Docket No. 9]) is DENIED because neither the motion nor the supporting memorandum provides any basis for granting the motion; and all other pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. 3. Raymond Lee Gearhart is restricted from filing new cases in this District unless he is represented by counsel or receives prior written authorization from a judicial officer in this District. 4. Judgment is entered accordingly. DATED: April 6, 2017 At Minneapolis, Minnesota s/ Michael J. Davis Michael J. Davis United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?