United States v. Tobey et al
Filing
43
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS granting 30 Motion for Default Judgment filed by United States of America (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on January 9, 2018. (HAZ)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
_____________________________________________________________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Civil Nos. 16-4096 (JRT/LIB)
Plaintiff,
v.
DARREN D. TOBEY, et al,
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Defendants,
________________________________________________________________________
Gregory Mokodean, DOJ-TAX, Tax Division, 555 Fourth Street NW,
Suite 8721, Washington, DC 20001, for plaintiff.
Michael P. Goodwin, MINNESOTA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S
OFFICE, 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 1100, St Paul, MN 55101-2128, for
defendant Minnesota Department of Revenue.
Annie P. Claesson-Huseby, BELTRAMI COUNTY ATTORNEY'S
OFFICE, 600 Minnesota Avenue, Suite 400, Bemidiji, MN 56601, for
defendant County of Beltrami.
Based upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge
Leo I. Brisbois, and after an independent review of the files, records and proceedings in
the above-entitled matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgments Against Defendants Darren D.
Tobey, Dex Media, Inc., and SWS Credit Services, Inc., [Docket No. 30], is GRANTED.
2.
The federal tax liens attributable to the assessments in the present case is
enforced.
3.
The Property be sold subject to further Order of this Court.
4.
The proceeds of said sale paid in accordance with the Stipulations in the
present case and to the United States toward the satisfaction of Defendant Tobey’s
outstanding federal tax liabilities.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: January 9, 2018
at Minneapolis, Minnesota
s/John R. Tunheim
JOHN R. TUNHEIM
Chief Judge
United States District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?