United States v. Tobey et al

Filing 43

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS granting 30 Motion for Default Judgment filed by United States of America (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on January 9, 2018. (HAZ)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA _____________________________________________________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Civil Nos. 16-4096 (JRT/LIB) Plaintiff, v. DARREN D. TOBEY, et al, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants, ________________________________________________________________________ Gregory Mokodean, DOJ-TAX, Tax Division, 555 Fourth Street NW, Suite 8721, Washington, DC 20001, for plaintiff. Michael P. Goodwin, MINNESOTA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE, 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 1100, St Paul, MN 55101-2128, for defendant Minnesota Department of Revenue. Annie P. Claesson-Huseby, BELTRAMI COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, 600 Minnesota Avenue, Suite 400, Bemidiji, MN 56601, for defendant County of Beltrami. Based upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois, and after an independent review of the files, records and proceedings in the above-entitled matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgments Against Defendants Darren D. Tobey, Dex Media, Inc., and SWS Credit Services, Inc., [Docket No. 30], is GRANTED. 2. The federal tax liens attributable to the assessments in the present case is enforced. 3. The Property be sold subject to further Order of this Court. 4. The proceeds of said sale paid in accordance with the Stipulations in the present case and to the United States toward the satisfaction of Defendant Tobey’s outstanding federal tax liabilities. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: January 9, 2018 at Minneapolis, Minnesota s/John R. Tunheim JOHN R. TUNHEIM Chief Judge United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?