Carlone v. City of Saint Paul Minnesota Council Members and other City/County Employees et al
Filing
28
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. 1. Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau's September 13, 2017 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 27 ) is ADOPTED. 2. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant City of St. Pauls Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 10 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as described in the Report and Recommendation, and this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 10/5/2017. (BJS) cc: Patrick A. Carlone. Modified text on 10/5/2017 (las).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Patrick A. Carlone,
Civil No. 16-4273 (DWF/SER)
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION
City of St. Paul,
Defendant.
The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation
of United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau dated September 13, 2017. (Doc.
No. 27.) No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time
period permitted. The factual background for the above-entitled matter is clearly and
precisely set forth in the Report and Recommendation and is incorporated by reference.
Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and upon all of the
files, records, and proceedings herein, the Court now makes and enters the following:
ORDER
1.
Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau’s September 13, 2017 Report and
Recommendation (Doc. No. [27]) is ADOPTED.
2.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant City of St. Paul’s Motion to
Dismiss (Doc. No. [10]) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as described in the
Report and Recommendation, and this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: October 5, 2017
s/Donovan W. Frank
DONOVAN W. FRANK
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?