Birapaka v. United States et al

Filing 13

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 8 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 7/27/17. (GRR) cc: Birapaka. Modified text on 7/27/2017 (MMP).

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Vara Birapaka, 

Case No. 0: 16‐cv‐04350‐MJD‐KMM
Plaintiff,

v.

ORDER

United States, John Doe, and John Doe,
Defendants.

Vara Birapaka, appearing pro se.

The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Katherine Menendez dated
June 30, 2017.  Plaintiff objects to the Report and Recommendation’s finding that
he has not properly served the Defendants.
Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the
record.  28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b).  Based upon that review, the
Court will ADOPT the Report and Recommendation in its entirety.  

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m).
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Date:   July 27, 2017

s/ Michael J. Davis                                
Michael J. Davis
United States District Court