Harris et al v. Maplewood Police Department et al

Filing 119

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 118 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Maplewood Police Department's Motion to Dismiss as a Discovery Sanction Pursuant to Rule 37 83 is DENIED. Plaintiff is prohibited from introducing any requested discovery into evidence or using any of the requested discovery in his claims or defenses. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 1/17/2019. (GRR)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Anthony Harris,

Case No. 17-cv-392 (MJD/SER)

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

Maplewood Police Department; and
John Doe, Arresting Officer,
Defendants.

Anthony Harris, Pro Se, (for Plaintiff); and
Joseph E. Flynn and Tal A. Bakke, Jardine Logan & O'Brien PLLP, 8519 Eagle
Point Boulevard, Suite 100, Lake Elmo, Minnesota 55042; and Tal A. Bakke, (for
Defendant).

The above-captioned case came before the undersigned on the Report and
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau. No objections
to the Report and Recommendation were filed within the requisite time period.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Maplewood Police
Department’s Motion to Dismiss as a Discovery Sanction Pursuant to Rule 37,
(ECF No. 83), is DENIED. Plaintiff is prohibited from introducing any requested

discovery into evidence or using any of the requested discovery in his claims or
defenses.

Dated: January 17, 2019

s/ Michael J. Davis
MICHAEL J. DAVIS
United States District Court

2