Gearhart v. Heart et al
Filing
11
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 10 . IT IS ORDERED: 1. These actions are SUMMARILY DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). 2. Motion for an attorney and an extension of time (Civil File No. 16-4035 (M JD/LIB) [Docket No. 9]) is DENIED because neither the motion nor the supporting memorandum provides any basis for granting the motion; and all other pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT 2 3 , 6 , and 7 . 3. Raymond Lee Gearhart is restricted from filing new cases in this District unless he is represented by counsel or receives prior written authorization from a judicial officer in this District. 4. Judgment is entered accordingly. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 4/6/17. (GRR)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
RAYMOND LEE GEARHART,
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 16-CV-4035 (MJD/LIB)
DR. HEART, et al.,
Defendants.
RAYMOND LEE GEARHART,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 17-CV-0215 (MJD/LIB)
DR. HEART, psychiatrist, et al.,
Defendants.
RAYMOND LEE GEARHART,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 17-CV-0507 (MJD/LIB)
DR. HEART and DR. GABLE,
Defendants.
RAYMOND LEE GEARHART,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 17-CV-0624 (MJD/LIB)
DR. HEART, psychologist, et al.,
Defendants.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Based upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I.
Brisbois, and after an independent review of the files, records and proceedings in the above-titled
matter, IT IS ORDERED:
1.
These actions are SUMMARILY DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(e)(2)(B).
2.
Motion for an attorney and an extension of time (Civil File No. 16-4035 (MJD/LIB)
[Docket No. 9]) is DENIED because neither the motion nor the supporting memorandum provides
any basis for granting the motion; and all other pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT.
3.
Raymond Lee Gearhart is restricted from filing new cases in this District unless he
is represented by counsel or receives prior written authorization from a judicial officer in this
District.
4.
Judgment is entered accordingly.
DATED: April 6, 2017
At Minneapolis, Minnesota
s/ Michael J. Davis
Michael J. Davis
United States District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?