Bank of America, N.A. v. Larson et al

Filing 75

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS remanding this matter to state court for lack of jurisdiction, and striking 42 Motion to Strike Pleading filed by Mary K. Larson, 53 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Mary K. Larson, and 39 Motion to Strike Pleading filed by Kirk D. Larson (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on January 9, 2018. (HAZ) cc: Alexander Larson, Kirk D. Larson, Mary K. Larson. Modified on 1/9/2018 (lmb).

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA _____________________________________________________________________ BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Civil No. 17-931 (JRT/TNL) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION KIRK D. LARSON, et al, Defendants. ________________________________________________________________________ Bradley N. Beisel, David Krco, BEISEL & DUNLEVY, PA, 730 Second Avenue South, Suite 282, Minneapolis, MN 55402, for plaintiff. Kirk D. Larson, 2315 Carver Avenue, Maplewood, MN 55119, pro se defendant. Alexander Larson, 2315 Carver Avenue East, Maplewood, MN 55119, pro se defendant. Mark K. Larson, 356 Ninth Avenue, Apartment 11, Saint Paul Park, MN 55071, pro se defendant. Based upon the Report and Recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung dated December 13, 2017 (Docket No. 71), along with all the files and records, and no objections to said Recommendation having been filed, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. This matter is REMANDED to state court for lack of jurisdiction. 2. Kirk D. Larson’s Motion to Strike Immaterial Matters (Docket No. 39); Mary K. Larson’s Motion to Strike Immaterial Matters (Docket No. 42); and Mary K. Larson’s Motion for Leave to Amend Pleading to Add Punitive Damages (Docket No. 53) are STRICKEN. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: January 9, 2018 at Minneapolis, Minnesota s/John R. Tunheim JOHN R. TUNHEIM Chief Judge United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?