Carter v. Robb et al

Filing 162

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Magistrate Judge Wright's October 21, 2019 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 161 ) is ADOPTED. Defendant Dr. Hiesterman's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 131) is GRANTED. Defendant Dr. Hiesterman is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE from this action. 4. This case is DISMISSED. 5. Plaintiff's "Motion to Demand Trial Due to "Vacate" Decision by Judge" (Doc. No. 156 ) is DENIED AS MOOT. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 1/23/2020. (las)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Ernest Carter, Civil No. 17-1061 (DWF/ECW) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Timothy Hiesterman, Defendant. The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright dated October 21, 2019. (Doc. No. 161.) No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. The factual background for the above-entitled matter is clearly and precisely set forth in the Report and Recommendation and is incorporated by reference. Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and upon all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, the Court now makes and enters the following: ORDER 1. Magistrate Judge Wright’s October 21, 2019 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. [161]) is ADOPTED. 2. Defendant Dr. Hiesterman’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 131) is GRANTED. 3. Defendant Dr. Hiesterman is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE from this 4. This case is DISMISSED. 5. Plaintiff’s “Motion to Demand Trial Due to “Vacate” Decision by Judge” action. (Doc. No. [156]) is DENIED AS MOOT. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: January 23, 2020 s/Donovan W. Frank DONOVAN W. FRANK United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?