Spencer v. Watson
Filing
8
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright on 08/14/2017. (TJB)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Antwoyn Spencer,
Case No. 17-cv-1381 (WMW/DTS)
Petitioner,
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION
v.
Warden T.J. Watson,
Respondent.
This matter is before the Court on the June 12, 2017 Report and Recommendation
(R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz.
(Dkt. 4.)
The R&R
recommends denying Petitioner Antwoyn Spencer’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus,
(Dkt. 1), and denying as moot Spencer’s motion to amend his petition for a writ of habeas
corpus, (Dkt. 2). Spencer timely filed objections to the R&R in which he asserts that this
Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241(c)(3).
A district court reviews de novo any aspect of an R&R to which a party timely
objects. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); LR 72.2(b)(3). Spencer asserts
generally that this Court has jurisdiction over his petition for a writ of habeas corpus
under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, but nothing in Spencer’s objections undermines the R&R’s
conclusion that his petition is an improper successive petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.
Consequently, having reviewed the conclusions of the R&R de novo, the Court overrules
Spencer’s objections, adopts the R&R, and dismisses Spencer’s petition for a writ of
habeas corpus for lack of jurisdiction.
ORDER
Based on the R&R and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED:
1.
Petitioner Antwoyn Spencer’s objections to the June 12, 2017 R&R,
(Dkt. 5), are OVERRULED;
2.
The June 12, 2017 R&R, (Dkt. 4), is ADOPTED;
3.
Petitioner Antwoyn Spencer’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, (Dkt. 1),
is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE;
4.
Petitioner Antwoyn Spencer’s motion to amend his petition for a writ of
habeas corpus, (Dkt. 2), is DENIED AS MOOT.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: August 14, 2017
s/Wilhelmina M. Wright
Wilhelmina M. Wright
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?