Hollie v. Roy et al

Filing 9

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. This matter is SUMMARILY DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Plaintiff's claims related to the validity of his term of conditional release are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff� 39;s claims related to the validity of the requirement that he register as a predatory offender are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AND ON THE MERITS. Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis 2 is DENIED. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on 6/30/2017. (ECW) cc: Shannon D. Hollie. Modified on 6/30/2017 (lmb).

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA  SHANNON D. HOLLIE, Case No. 17‐CV‐1434 (PJS/SER) Plaintiff, v. ORDER TOM ROY, Commissioner of Minnesota Department of Corrections; MONA DOHMAN, Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension; MIKE O’FREEMAN, Hennepin County Attorney, Defendants. Shannon D. Hollie, pro se. This is a civil‐rights action brought by plaintiff Shannon Hollie challenging the alleged imposition of a ten‐year term of conditional release and the requirement that he register as a predatory offender.  In a May 30, 2017 Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau recommends summarily dismissing Hollie’s complaint.  Specifically, Judge Rau recommends dismissing Hollie’s conditional‐release claim without prejudice as barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994) and dismissing Hollie’s registration claim with prejudice for failure to state a claim. This matter is before the Court on Hollie’s objection to the R&R.  The Court has conducted a de novo review.  28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).  Based on that review, the Court overrules Hollie’s objection and adopts the R&R.   ORDER Based on the foregoing, and on all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, the Court ADOPTS the May 30, 2017 R&R [ECF No. 7].  IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. This matter is SUMMARILY DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) as follows: a. Plaintiff’s claims related to the validity of his term of conditional release are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. b. Plaintiff’s claims related to the validity of the requirement that he register as a predatory offender are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AND ON THE MERITS. 2. Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 2] is DENIED. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated:  June 30, 2017 s/Patrick J. Schiltz                                           Patrick J. Schiltz United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?