Hunter v. Rockefeller, IV et al

Filing 14

ORDER denying as moot 2 Application on Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs; denying as moot 4 Motion ; denying as moot 5 Motion ; adopting Report and Recommendations re 7 Report and Recommendation.(Written Opinion) Signed by Senior Judge David S. Doty on 6/21/2017. (DLO) Modified text on 6/21/2017 (ACH). cc: Dannez Hunter

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Civil No. 17-1630(DSD/LIB) Dannez Hunter, Individual Direct Heir, from the Estate of Anna Short Harrington, and Olivia Hunter a/k/a (“Aunt Jemima”), Plaintiff, v. ORDER John D.J. Rockefeller, IV, sued in his individual and official capacity, et al., Defendants. This matter is before the court upon the objections by pro se plaintiff Dannez W. Hunter to the June 8, 2017, report recommendation of Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois (R&R). and The magistrate judge recommends that the court dismiss the case as frivolous. The magistrate judge further recommends that Hunter’s related motions be denied. Hunter timely objected to the R&R. The court reviews the R&R de novo. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(b). After a thorough review of the file and record, the court finds that the R&R is well-reasoned and correct and that Hunter’s objection should be overruled. Indeed, Hunter’s arguments as set forth in objection are patently baseless and, at times, incoherent. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The objection to the R&R [ECF No. 8] is overruled; 2. The R&R [ECF No. 7] is adopted in its entirety; the 3. The action is dismissed without prejudice; and 4. The remaining pending motions [ECF Nos. 2, 4, and 5] are denied as moot. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: June 21, 2017 s/David S. Doty David S. Doty, Judge United States District Court 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?