Hunter v. Rockefeller, IV et al
ORDER denying as moot 2 Application on Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs; denying as moot 4 Motion ; denying as moot 5 Motion ; adopting Report and Recommendations re 7 Report and Recommendation.(Written Opinion) Signed by Senior Judge David S. Doty on 6/21/2017. (DLO) Modified text on 6/21/2017 (ACH). cc: Dannez Hunter
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Civil No. 17-1630(DSD/LIB)
Dannez Hunter, Individual
Direct Heir, from the Estate
of Anna Short Harrington, and
Olivia Hunter a/k/a (“Aunt Jemima”),
John D.J. Rockefeller, IV, sued
in his individual and official
capacity, et al.,
This matter is before the court upon the objections by pro se
recommendation of Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois (R&R).
magistrate judge recommends that the court dismiss the case as
The magistrate judge further recommends that Hunter’s
related motions be denied.
Hunter timely objected to the R&R.
The court reviews the R&R de novo.
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C);
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(b).
After a thorough
review of the file and record, the court finds that the R&R is
well-reasoned and correct and that Hunter’s objection should be
objection are patently baseless and, at times, incoherent.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
The objection to the R&R [ECF No. 8] is overruled;
The R&R [ECF No. 7] is adopted in its entirety;
The action is dismissed without prejudice; and
The remaining pending motions [ECF Nos. 2, 4, and 5] are
denied as moot.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: June 21, 2017
s/David S. Doty
David S. Doty, Judge
United States District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?