Peet et al v. Sidney et al

Filing 204

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Report and Recommendation 203 is ACCEPTED; Plaintiff's Motion for Default for Failure to Comply with a Judge Order with Local Rule Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(A) and Rule 36 Admission Sue Morfit and Mark Jones 155 is DENIED. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Eric C. Tostrud on 2/11/2020. (RMM)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA John E. Peet, File No. 17-cv-1870 (ECT/TNL) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Sue Morfit, et al., Defendants. ________________________________________________________________________ The Court has received the January 21, 2020 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. ECF No. 203. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 203] is ACCEPTED; 2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Default for Failure to Comply with a Judge Order with Local Rule Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(A) and Rule 36 Admission Sue Morfit and Mark Jones [ECF No. 155] is DENIED. Dated: February 11, 2020 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?