LeMond v. Stinchfield et al

Filing 89

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS denying without prejudice 50 Motion to Dismiss/General filed by Frederick Harold Stinchfield, II, Frederick Harold Stinchfield, Frederick Harold Stinchfield, III, and denying without prejudice 43 Motion to Dismiss/General filed by Frederick Harold Stinchfield, II, Frederick Harold Stinchfield, Frederick Harold Stinchfield, III (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on January 5, 2018. (HAZ)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
_____________________________________________________________________
GREGORY J. LEMOND,

Civil No. 17-2071 (JRT/TNL)

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION

FREDERICK HAROLD STINCHFIELD,
also known as Frederick Harold
Stinchfield, II, and FREDERICK
HAROLD STINCHFIELD,also known as
Frederick Harold Stinchfield, III,,
Defendants.
________________________________________________________________________
Karl C. Procaccini, Lawrence M. Shapiro, and Matthew D. Forsgren,
GREENE ESPEL PLLP, 222 South Ninth Street, Suite 2200,
Minneapolis, MN 55402, for plaintiff,
Zorislav R. Leyderman, THE LAW OFFICE OF ZORISLAV R.
LEYDERMAN, 222 South Ninth Street, Suite 1600, Minneapolis, MN
55402, defendants.
Based upon the Report and Recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge
Tony N. Leung dated December 13, 2017 (Docket No. 86), along with all the files and
records, and no objections to said Recommendation having been filed, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED that:
1. Stinchfield III’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 43) is DENIED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE.
2. Stinchfield II’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 50) is DENIED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE.

Dated: January 5, 2018
at Minneapolis, Minnesota

s/John R. Tunheim
JOHN R. TUNHEIM
Chief Judge
United States District Court