Patterson v. Kintu et al

Filing 60

ORDER denying 54 Motion to Alter/Amend/Supplement Pleadings(Written Opinion) Signed by Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson on 4/16/2018. (TMM)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Honora Tremaine Patterson, Civ. No. 17-2263 (DSD/BRT) Plaintiff, v. Emmanual Kintu; Nick Dechene; Dan Meyer; Steve McCarty; Tim Demolling; Aoun Noor; John Spielman; John Ricci; and Chris Roth, each sued in their personal capacities, ORDER Defendants. On March 26, 2018, pro se Plaintiff Honora Tremaine Patterson filed a motion for leave to file an amended complaint. (Doc. No. 54.) Plaintiff’s motion is untimely under the Pretrial Scheduling Order, which provides that amended pleadings were due by December 15, 2017, and Plaintiff failed to establish good cause to modify the scheduling order. Therefore, Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint (Doc. No. 54) is DENIED. Plaintiff also filed a request for disclosure of certain discovery that he needs to review when responding to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. (Doc. No. 57.) In response, Defendants explain that they plan to submit the requested information when they file their motion for summary judgment. Therefore, Plaintiff’s request (Doc. No. 57) is DENIED without prejudice. Date: April 16, 2018. s/ Becky R. Thorson BECKY R. THORSON United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?