Jackson et al v. Mike-Lopez et al

Filing 113

ORDER addressing 111 Response.(Written Opinion). Signed by Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson on 2/27/2019. (TMM)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Ronnie Jackson; Joshua Jones; Shane
Kringen; Marvin Franco-Morales;
Mitchell Osterloh; and Jesse Plentyhorse,

Civ. No. 17-4278 (JRT/BRT)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER

v.
Sharlene Mike-Lopez; Diane Medchill;
Kathy Ried; Bruce Rieser; David Rieshus;
Tom Roy; and Michelle Smith, sued in
their individual capacities,
Defendants.

Plaintiff Ronnie Jackson submitted a response (Doc. No. 111) to Defendant’s
Motion for Extension of Time to File Dispositive Motions. (Doc. No. 104.) Plaintiff’s
response was filed after the Court granted Defendant’s motion for an extension. (Doc.
No. 110.) Plaintiff’s submission does not convince the Court that it was wrong to grant
Defendant’s motion for an extension.
Plaintiff also requests that Defendants produce a surveillance video prior to the
date of mediation requested by Plaintiff. The Court, however, already denied Plaintiff’s
request for a mediated settlement conference. (Doc. No. 110.)
For these reasons, the relief requested by Plaintiff’s response (Doc. No. 111) is
DENIED.

Dated: February 27, 2019

s/ Becky R. Thorson
BECKY R. THORSON
United States Magistrate Judge